Sessions spoke with Russia during campaign

US Attorney General Jeff Sessions failed to disclose that he spoke with the Russian ambassador twice last year, with the revelation coming hours after a lawmaker said allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow would be investigated.


Sessions did not disclose the meetings when he was asked about contacts between members of President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia during his confirmation hearing to become attorney general, the Washington Post reported citing Justice Department officials.

At his confirmation hearing in January, Sessions was asked what he would do if he learned if anyone part of the Trump campaign had communicated with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign, the Post reported.

“I’m not aware of any of those activities,” he said. “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians,” he added.

A spokeswoman for Sessions said the answer was not misleading as the then-senator had had conversations with over 25 foreign ambassadors as a member of the Armed Services Committee, the Post reported.

Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi was quick to call for his resignation.

“Jeff Sessions lied under oath during his confirmation hearing before the Senate … Sessions is not fit to serve as the top law enforcement officer of our country and must resign,” she said in a statement.

“If it’s true that Sessions failed to disclose his meeting with (Russian ambassador) Kislyak, he must recuse himself. This is not even a close call; it is a must,” US Representative Adam Schiff wrote on Twitter.

Hours earlier, Schiff had said the House Intelligence Committee would investigate allegations of collusion between Trump’s election campaign and Russia.

Schiff, ranking minority member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Democrats and Republicans had reached a written agreement late Wednesday.

“We are committed to doing it,” he said. “There is every reason to do a thorough investigation here.”

Schiff announced the probe on Twitter, saying both parties were “now committed to investigate all aspects of Russian active measures including any collusion with Trump campaign.”

In an interview with MSNBC he declined to provide any details about what evidence the committee had gathered, but said the first testimony was coming “fairly imminently.”

Reports in US media last month alleged that Trump campaign staff, including former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, had had “repeated contacts” with senior Russian intelligence officials during the year before Trump’s surprise election victory.

Last month, US National Security Advisor Michael Flynn resigned over misleading accounts he gave about phone calls with Russian officials.

Shrinking trade surplus to be short-lived

Australia’s foreign trade position had a weak start to the year, but economists believe it will rebound on solid coal and iron prices and a boost in liquefied natural gas exports.


The trade surplus fell to $1.3 billion in January, from December’s $3.3 billion, as exports slipped three per cent and imports rose four per cent.

National Australia Bank economics director David de Garis said the drop in exports was driven by a $671 million, or 39 per cent, slump in gold exports.

He said that was mainly related to flooding affecting output at Newcrest’s Mining’s Telfer gold mine in Western Australia.

Weather could also explain a seven per cent, or $406 million, fall in coal exports, Mr de Garis said, and a drop of two per cent, or $151 million, in metal ore and mineral exports.

“With Telfer hit by bad weather, it’s conceivable that weather could have also adversely affected iron ore in January,” he said.

“That’s quite usual at this time of the year when northern monsoons often interrupt activity.”

National Australia Bank chief markets economist Ivan Colhoun said imports were strong across the board, including a seven per cent, or $543 million, jump in consumption goods, and consumer electronics in particular.

“You can look at that and say that’s bad, or you can look at that as showing domestic demand is rising,” Mr Colhoun said.

JP Morgan economist Tom Kennedy said the decline in Australia’s foreign trade position looks overdone.

Coal and iron ore prices and liquefied natural gas exports would help turn things around in coming months, he said.

“Iron ore prices continue to run well ahead of both JP Morgan and consensus expectations, while coal contract prices for the first quarter are still elevated,” Mr Kennedy said.

“Supporting these nominal drivers is the looming supply expansion in LNG which we expect will become more prominent in the trade release as we progress through 2017.”

Surprise jump in building approvals in Jan

Housing approval growth has continued into the new year, though Australia’s longest housing construction boom appears to be moderating.


Approvals for the construction of new homes rose 1.8 per cent in January to 17,412 dwellings, beating market expectations of a 0.3 per cent fall.

However, housing approvals over the 12 months to January were down 12 per cent, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, likely providing relief to regulators worried about a growing asset bubble.

The gains for January were led by a 6.2 per cent increase in approvals in what are categorised as ‘other dwellings’, which includes apartment blocks and townhouses.

Approvals for private sector houses fell three per cent, and have now fallen for two consecutive months.

“The 12 month trend in dwelling approvals certainly appears to be weakening, with the level of detached dwelling approvals now sitting closer to the pace seen in mid-2013,” JP Morgan economist Henry St John said.

“While some institutions are still lending toward such activity, it seems relatively safe to say that approvals have peaked for the cycle.”

The decline in house approvals is also seen as significant as it comes amid record low interest rates.

National Australia Bank chief economist David de Garis said this possibly reflects a flow-on from concerns about likely surplus apartments in the next six to 12 months, but the lower supply may also be partly responsible for the continued strong performance of house prices.

While apartment approval numbers tend to be volatile on a monthly basis, the large number of approvals, particularly in NSW, means housing construction will contribute to growth again this year, economists said.

The nuclear option: What a war with North Korea would look like

When Barack Obama left office, he reportedly told incoming president Donald Trump the most urgent challenge he would face was that of North Korea.


North Korea has been working on developing its nuclear capabilities and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

It aims to develop the capability to mount a nuclear attack on the mainland United States.

The capability is necessary to defend the country from US aggression, the country says. It’s been pursuing the technology for more than 50 years.


North Korea claims it already has the ability to shrink a nuclear bomb onto a device small enough to fit on a missile – but it doesn’t yet have a functioning long-range projectile.

The US is determined to stop the rogue state from developing such capabilities, with the Trump administration ratcheting up diplomatic and military pressure on the country.

America is also continuing a cyber-campaign aimed at sabotaging North Korea’s capabilities, and has begun deploying a missile defence system in South Korea.

President Trump has said a potential war with North Korea could kill millions, and is counting on China to exert its influence over North Korea.

Should their efforts fail, the United States has refused to rule out a military strike on North Korea, with the Pyongyang administration also threatening potential pre-emptive strikes.

Military action from either side could trigger a potentially catastrophic conflict.

A man watches a TV news program reporting about North Korea’s missile firing with at Seoul Train Station in Seoul, April 29, 2017.AP Photo/Lee Jin-man

The decision to strike

The United States considers it relatively unlikely that North Korea would risk its survival by provoking the US with an attack on the country or its allies.

America’s nuclear weapons and sophisticated military function as a strong deterrent.

But heightened rhetoric on both sides has North Korean analysts worried.

Jenny Town, Managing Editor of 38 North and Assistant Director of the US-Korea Institute at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, says increased tensions means there’s an increased risk of errors being made.

“It’s basically a high-risk game of chicken being played between Trump and Kim Jong-Un,” Ms Town told SBS News.

“The higher the rhetoric gets, the higher the risk of miscalculations.”

USS Carl Vinson has been redirected to the region, with the aircraft carrier involved in a joint missile defence drill with the South Korean navy.

An aerial photo shows the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier US Carl Vinson sailing offshore of Nagasaki Prefecture on April 29, 2017.The Yomiuri Shimbun via AP Images

Malcolm Davis, Senior Analyst in Defence Strategy and Capability at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, says that if North Korea keeps pursuing nuclear missile technology, it could push the United States into a first strike.

“The challenge is going to be in 18 months’ time, as North Korea gets very close to being able to put a nuclear warhead on an ICBM,” he told SBS News.

“The US would then be forced to act to prevent North Korea from being able to threaten the continental United States.”

Mr Davis says the development of a missile capable of delivering a nuclear bomb to the US mainland would be an intolerable red line for the superpower.

“We may not be able to stop it without fighting a major war on the peninsula, and we just have to get ready for that eventuality,” he said.

US & South Korean marines participate in an annual Combined Joint Logistics over the Shore exercise against a possible attack from North Korea, in Pohang, 2014.EPA/JEON HEON-KYUN

Ms Town is more wary.

“Having an ICBM is a big deal, but at the same time, our partners in the region would feel like the red lines are already crossed,” she said.

North Korea already has missiles capable of reaching South Korea and Japan, potentially with a nuclear warhead.

Ms Town is hopeful that diplomatic and economic pressure will bring North Korea to the negotiating table.

If development of an ICBM is a definitive red line which would trigger a major military response, President Trump needs to make that unambiguously clear in order to provide deterrence, Ms Town says.

It’s advice President Trump doesn’t appear to be taking.

“I don’t know. I mean, we’ll see,” he said in a recent interview when asked if North Korea risked a military strike if it continued nuclear tests.

America attacks

There’s no knowing exactly what a US first strike on North Korea would look like, but analysts speculate that it would have to be a major surprise attack in order to minimise the potential for retaliation.

While the locations of North Korea’s naval and air forces are relatively easy to target, the country also operates a fleet of hundreds of mobile short- and medium-range missile launchers, according to a 2015 Pentagon report.

The United States’ Defence Department believes the on-road and off-road missile launchers – the type proudly shown in North Korean military parades – would be capable of targeting sites in South Korea and Japan.

“These are the kind of things that they put in place to ensure that people have to think twice before trying to engineer some kind of pre-emptive strike or regime change, as the North Koreans have seen in other countries,” Ms Town said.

Having witnessed the overthrow of regimes in Iraq and Libya, North Korea remains committed to its ballistic missile force as a form of deterrence, Ms Town said.

Off-road missile transport is paraded across Kim Il Sung Square during a military parade on Saturday, April 15, 2017, in Pyongyang, North Korea.AP Photo/Wong Maye-E

The missiles are within striking distance of major, global cities such as Tokyo and Seoul, as well as a number of US bases in the region.

The Pentagon has more than 73,000 personnel deployed in Japan and South Korea.

For its part, Australia has thousands of tourists in the region, and thousands more ex-pats who live there longer term.

While the US may have the technical capability to destroy the mobile missile launchers, pinning down their precise whereabouts at any one time is a challenge.

In reality, a number of short- and medium-range missile launchers would likely survive any initial attack, Mr Davis says.

“We may not be able to have the opportunity to take out those missiles before they’re launched, which means we then have to rely on missile defence to actually shoot down those missiles,” he said.

“And missile defence is not 100 per cent effective.”

Nevertheless, the US has begun installing a Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile defence system in South Korea, elements of which may be operational within days.

The first elements of the THAAD system arrived in South Korea. Monday, March 6, 2017. US Forces Korea

North Korean retaliation

Whatever the scale of an attack, analysts say the response from North Korea would likely be swift and unforgiving.

Ms Town says that any type of military strike would spark “a kinetic response, which could very easily escalate into war.”

“It would get really ugly,” she said.

In addition to missile capabilities, the United States also suspects North Korea of maintaining a chemical weapons program, with a stockpile of nerve, blister, blood, and choking agents.

The country also has a large, responsive, conventional land-based military – much of which is positioned to attack South Korea, and which the Pentagon believes could be activated with little or no warning.

An undated photograph released by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on 26 April 2017 shows a combined fire demonstration of North Korean artillery. EPA/KCNA

The South Korean capital of Seoul – and its 25 million residents – are just 50km from the North Korean border.

“The carnage would be horrendous,” US Senator John McCain, Chairman of Senate Armed Services Committee, recently told CNN.

Mr Davis says any attack on North Korea is likely to draw “massive retaliation”.

“In some of the worst case scenarios we’re talking massive war on the peninsula. We’re talking North Korea unleashing massive artillery bombardments at Seoul, launching chemical biological, perhaps even nuclear weapons against South Korea and Japan,” he said.

“So we have to be prepared for that potentially.”

South Koreans watching a television news broadcast at a station in Seoul, South Korea. North Korea has test-fired an unidentified type of ballistic missile.AAP

China’s response

For years, China has provided a level of economic and military support for North Korea.

It has done so as a result of its own strategic calculations, says Professor Pei Minxin, an expert in US-China relations.

“For the rest of the world, the North Koreans appear to be irrational, crazy, aggressive. For China, North Korea is a very valuable piece of real estate,” he said.

“It provides a security buffer between the US and China.”

Without North Korea, America’s 28,000 troops in South Korea would be sitting right next door to China.

A Map of the region showing China, North Korea, South Korea and Japan.Google Maps

In 1950, the US and China were drawn into a devastating proxy war on the Korean peninsula.

But while China has been irked by the US maneuvering an aircraft carrier into the region and establishing a missile defence system on its doorstep, it’s not certain the two superpowers would go to war over North Korea.

China’s support of its rogue neighbour has its limits, Mr Davis says.

“I think that they think that China is, to a degree, their security guarantor, but they probably recognise that China is not going to end up in a shooting war with the United States over North Korea,” he said.

“China would have the military option to intervene into North Korea, but the question is, would it do so? I suspect it won’t, I suspect it would keep its forces on its side of the border and just wait to see what happens.”

But war would have a significant impact on North Korea’s northern neighbour.

The fall of the regime would see streams of refugees flowing into China, analysts told SBS News.

“And in the ultimate worst-case scenario, if North Korea were to use nuclear weapons and the US was to respond with a nuclear strike, then you would get fallout drifting from North Korea into China,” Mr Davis said.

“So the Chinese don’t want war in the peninsula.”

Chinese President Xi Jinping waves to the press as he walks with US President Donald Trump April 7, 2017.Getty Images

Avoiding catastrophe

While analysts may differ on the likelihood of conflict and the strategies to prevent it, there is universal agreement that in a war with North Korea, there is unlikely to be a ‘winner’.

The US risks tens of thousands of troops in the region, South Korea and Japan risk attacks on their major cities, the North Korean regime faces oblivion and China would have to deal with a humanitarian and strategic catastrophe just two hours’ flight from Beijing.

But while no country has an incentive for conflict, the strategic calculations of North Korea and the United States may prove irreconcilable.

“The real solution to this is for the US and China to somehow work together to remove this threat,” Mr Davis said. “But the question is, how do you do this without risking major war on the peninsula?”

Much of the situation is uncertain because leaders on both sides of the stand-off are unpredictable.

“It is a chess game. I just don’t want people to know what my thinking is,” President Trump said in a recent interview.

“Eventually, he will have a better delivery system. And if that happens, we can’t allow it to happen.”

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson speaks during a Ministerial level Security Council meeting on the situation in North Korea, April 28, 2017.AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has warned of “catastrophic consequences” if the world fails to stop North Korea’s military development.

Ms Town says North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s pursuit of nuclear deterrence is driven by rational strategic calculations, and hopes that negotiations can bring the situation back from the brink.

Mr Davis is not so convinced.

He says the young, inexperienced Supreme Leader cannot be counted on to think logically, with his escalating rhetoric driven by a desire to consolidate power internally.

“There’s nothing the outside world can do about that, that’s purely internal North Korean politics,” he said.

“There may not be a peaceful solution to this.”


Ten missing after US warship collides with oil tanker off Singapore

The guided-missile destroyer USS John S.


McCain collided with the merchant vessel Alnic MC near the Straits of Malacca in the early hours, the US Navy said.

“Initial reports indicate John S. McCain sustained damage to her port side aft,” it said in a statement as the ship headed to port in Singapore.

“There are currently 10 sailors missing and five injured… Search and rescue efforts are underway in coordination with local authorities.

“The extent of damage and personnel injuries is being determined. The incident will be investigated.”

Four of the injured sailors were evacuated from the warship to a Singapore hospital by helicopter with non-life-threatening injuries while the fifth did not require further medical attention, the navy said.

0:00 US Navy ship collision ‘could have been prevented’, says security expert Share US Navy ship collision ‘could have been prevented’, says security expert

The navy said the destroyer was sailing under its own power after the collision with the Liberian-flagged tanker in Malaysian waters at 5.24 am as it headed for a routine stop in Singapore.

The vessel is named after US Senator John McCain’s father and grandfather, who were both admirals in the US navy.

McCain said in a tweet that he and his wife “are keeping America’s sailors aboard the USS John S McCain in our prayers tonight – appreciate the work of search & rescue crews”.

MT @US7thFleet: #USSJohnSMcCain – 10 missing and 5 injured. 4 evacuated by helicopter to hospital for non-life threatening injuries.

— U.S. Pacific Fleet (@USPacificFleet) August 21, 2017

President Donald Trump initially said “that’s too bad” in response to reporters’ shouted questions about the collision, as he arrived back at the White House after a holiday.

He followed up with a tweet: “Thoughts & prayers are w/ our @USNavy sailors aboard the #USSJohnSMcCain where search & rescue efforts are underway.”

0:00 ‘That’s too bad’: Trump on the Navy crash Share ‘That’s too bad’: Trump on the Navy crash

Malaysian Navy, Airforce and Maritime vessels and aircrafts deployed for #USSJohnSMcCain SAR. Pse pray for their safety pic.twitter苏州美甲培训学校按摩论坛,/aFZ19IYpaU

— Chief of Navy – PTL (@mykamarul) August 21, 2017

It was the second collision in recent times involving a US warship after seven sailors died in June when the destroyer USS Fitzgerald collided with a Philippine-flagged cargo ship in a busy channel in Japan.

Air-sea search

After the latest incident on Monday, a major search and rescue operation was launched, with planes and vessels from Singapore, Malaysia and the US involved.

Singapore sent three tugboats, and four navy and police coastguard vessels while Malaysia – whose southern Johor state was close to the collision – deployed eight ships and said it was going to send aircraft to help in the search.

A US helicopter was taking part in the search and two other American aircraft were expected to arrive soon, the navy said.

#USSJohnSMcCain collided with the #AlnicMC; a merchant oil tanker pic.twitter苏州美甲培训学校按摩论坛,/BGf1A1tCFL

— Strategic Sentinel (@StratSentinel) August 20, 2017

The ship involved in the accident is a Liberian-flagged tanker used for transporting oil and chemicals and weighing over 30,000 tonnes, according to industry website Marine Traffic.

In the June accident, the collision happened in a busy channel not far from Yokosuka, a gateway to container ports in the Japanese capital Tokyo and nearby Yokohama.

The dead sailors, aged 19 to 37, were found by divers in flooded sleeping berths a day after the collision tore a huge gash in the side of the Fitzgerald.

A senior admiral announced last week that the commander of the destroyer and several other officers were relieved of their duties aboard their ship over the incident.


There have been around 30 ship collisions over the past decade in that area, including a 2013 incident in which six Japanese crew died, according to the Japan Coast Guard.

The USS John S. McCain is part of the US Seventh Fleet, and its home base is Yokosuka, in Japan.

Wallabies display ‘unacceptable’: Speight

Wallabies players didn’t need a spray from coach Michael Cheika or any of their teammates to understand the magnitude of their Bledisloe Cup horror show, winger Henry Speight says.


The Australian team sat through a sobering video review session on Monday before resuming preparations for Saturday’s second Test against New Zealand in Dunedin.

It will take a turnaround of unprecedented proportions for the Wallabies to keep the series alive after Saturday’s stunning 54-34 capitulation in Sydney.

Speight, who contributed to the side’s defensive malaise with five missed tackles, said players were under no illusions as to how much ground they have to make up after one of the worst performances in recent memory.

“A lot of harsh truths didn’t have to be said,” Speight told reporters in Christchurch, where the team is training until Thursday.

“Us as individuals and us as players can be the harshest on ourselves.

“We knew that first half especially is a standard that is not acceptable and that in itself is a big reality check for us players.

“We didn’t need much of the coaches or much video for that be brought to face for us.

“It’s for us to take a bit more pride and take individual action and do whatever is necessary to fix that.”

Several personnel changes are likely for the clash at the indoor Forsyth Barr Stadium, with outside centre Samu Kerevi and debutant winger Curtis Rona in danger of being cut after sub-standard defensive displays.

Dane Haylett-Petty is expected to be available after missing last week with a bicep injury and will come into calculations.

Tevita Kuridrani is also a strong chance to replace Kerevi, who was rusty in his first match since recovering from the ankle injury he sustained while playing for the Queensland Reds in early June.

Mammograms from 40 save more lives: study

When a woman turns 40 is the optimal age to start having regular mammograms to reduce the number of breast cancer deaths, the findings of a US study suggests.


Researchers in New York compared the commonly recommended mammograms schemes used in the US to estimate the most effective at reducing breast cancer mortality.

These included annual screening from age 40; annual screening between the ages of 45 to 54 then every second year from 55 to 79; or every second year from 50 to 74.

According to the computer modelling, the first scheme reduced breast cancer deaths by an estimated 40 per cent, compared to 23 per cent and 31 per cent for the other schemes.

“If the goal is to avert the most breast cancer deaths and gain the most life-years, CISNET modelling shows that the optimal age of initiation for screening mammography is 40 years, the optimal screening is annual, and the optimal stopping age is when a woman’s life expectancy is less than five to seven years,” the authors concluded.

The findings are published in the international journal Cancer.

In Australia, the national breast cancer screening program – BreastScreen Australia – invites women aged between 50 and 74 for a free mammogram every two years.

When to initiate screening for breast cancer has sparked controversy in the past, says Cancer Council Australia boss Professor Sanchia Aranda.

“There was a lot of controversy at the time when the federal government extended the breast program here from 69 to 74 in terms of whether that age group should benefit from extra screening as opposed to going down to those in their 40s,” said Professor Sanchia Aranda.

“We currently probably over-screen some women at two years (intervals) and under-screen others,” Prof Aranda added.

Despite this, women at average risk of breast cancer should be “confident” in the national screening program, says Prof Aranda.

However, women with a strong family history of breast cancer are advised to be more vigilant and should seek advice from their GP

“If you have got a strong family history of beast cancer you probably want to be more vigilant than the current screening program might give you and particularly if you are young,” said Prof Aranda.

Professor Aranda says what the US study importantly confirms is that mammograms do save lives.

Breast cancer deaths have reduced by nearly 50 per cent since the introduction of mammography in Australia and more women should participate in the nations screening program.

“We currently have a less than 70 per cent participation, so we would like to see all women in the screening age participate and that would help to reduce breast cancer mortality even further,” said Professor Aranda.

US, South Korea conduct military drills

US and South Korean troops have started their annual drills that come after President Donald Trump and North Korea exchanged warlike rhetoric in the wake of the North’s two intercontinental ballistic missile tests last month.


The Ulchi Freedom Guardian drills are largely computer-simulated war games held every summer and have drawn furious responses from North Korea, which views them as an invasion rehearsal. Pyongyang’s state media on Sunday called this year’s drills a “reckless” move that could trigger the “uncontrollable phase of a nuclear war.”

Despite the threat, US and South Korean militaries launched this year’s 11-day training on Monday morning as scheduled. The exercise involves 17,500 American troops and 50,000 South Korean soldiers, according to the US military command in South Korea and Seoul’s Defence Ministry.

The exercises, the world’s largest computerised war-simulated drills, include representatives from seven member countries of the United Nations Command – Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Netherlands, Denmark and Colombia – allied nations in the Korean War between 1950 and 1953.

No field training like live-fire exercises or tank manoeuvring is involved in the Ulchi drills, in which alliance officers sit at computers to practice how they engage in battles and hone their decision-making capabilities. The allies have said the drills are defensive in nature.

South Korea’s President Moon Jae-in said on Monday that North Korea must not use the drills as a pretext to launch fresh provocation, saying the training is held regularly because of repeated provocations by Pyongyang.

North Korea typically responds to South Korea-US military exercises with weapons tests and a string of belligerent rhetoric. During last year’s Ulchi drills, North Korea test-fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile that flew about 500km in the longest flight by that type of weapon. Days after the drills, the North carried out its fifth and biggest nuclear test to date.

Last month North Korea test-launched two ICBMs at highly lofted angles, and outside experts say those missiles can reach some US parts like Alaska, Los Angeles or Chicago if fired at normal, flattened trajectories.

Earlier this month, President Trump pledged to answer North Korean aggression with “fire and fury.” North Korea, for its part, threatened to launch missiles toward the American territory of Guam before its leader Kim Jong Un backed off.

Five charged over fatal SA crash

Five teenagers have been charged with manslaughter over a fatal hit-and-run crash in Adelaide.


The five were all arrested and charged on Monday after the Sunday morning crash which killed Lucy Paveley at suburban Parafield.

The 40-year-old died when an allegedly stolen 4WD slammed into her car at an intersection on Main North Road.

Four boys, two aged 15, one aged 14 and one aged 13 will all appear in the Adelaide Youth Court on Tuesday.

An 18-year-old man will appear in the Adelaide Magistrates Court.

It was alleged by police that two of the teenagers in the 4WD fled the scene of the crash and were picked up by another allegedly stolen car.

Police said a task force set up to investigate the crash was continuing its inquiries and further charges were likely.

An independent Commissioner’s Inquiry had also been established to investigate police involvement in the incident, with a patrol engaged in a brief pursuit of the second car before the crash.

The case is tragically similar to one in Adelaide less than a year ago when 48-year-old Nicole Tucker was killed when two youths in a stolen ute crashed into her car at high-speed, with the driver jailed for just 18 months.

The community outrage over Ms Tucker’s death promoted South Australian Attorney General John Rau to introduce legislation to allow for tougher sentences for youths in such cases.

Mr Rau described Sunday’s incident as “grotesquely unacceptable” and said he would ensure that if the bill passed parliament it would apply in the current case should convictions be secured.

“The public expect these people to be dealt with in a serious way,” he said

Abbott warns of implications of ‘de-gendering’ marriage as Qantas endorses Yes campaign

Senior Liberals are publicly venting differences on the same-sex marriage debate as the battle lines are drawn ahead of the government’s planned postal survey.


The former Prime Minister Tony Abbott took to Sydney radio station 2GB on Monday to further link the debate to other social issues.

“This isn’t just about marriage. Sure, marriage is the immediate focus but there are lots and lots of implications here and we’ve got to think them through before we take this big leap into what I think is the dark,” he said.


“How, for instance, can we legitimately say no to gender fluidity programs like so-called Safe Schools if we’ve de-gendered marriage? If we’ve officially sanctioned de-gendering marriage, it’s very hard not to see de-gendering come in in so many other areas as well.”

He was responding to claims made by the Attorney-General on Sunday that he was trying to trick the Australian public.

“What I am not going to do is be tricked by Tony Abbott and others who are trying to trying to turn a debate about one issue, that is about whether same-sex couples should be able to marry, into a broader debate about religious freedom because that is not what this is about,” Senator Brandis told Sky News.

Two junior Liberal Ministers have also joined the tit-for-tat.

Liberal Senator Zed Seselja and Lower House MP Angus Hume, both part of the Liberals’ conservative faction, back Mr Abbott’s position.

“It does impact upon religious freedom, it does impact upon parental rights and it does impact on freedom of speech,” Senator Seselja told Sky News.

“I respectfully disagree with George Brandis on this issue, if you look around the world, issues of religious freedom has flowed when we’ve seen a change to the definition of marriage.”

Qantas CEO Alan Joyce with Bill Shorten has lent his support to the ‘yes’ campaign. AAP

Labor blasts government as Qantas endorses ‘yes’ campaign

The Opposition Leader told reporters in Sydney the government was desperately out of touch.

“This statistical survey changes nothing about your ability go to church or religious freedom, let’s be straight about that, it is a distraction,” he said.

“I just say to the marriage equality opponents, you wanted this survey and now you are trying to throw every other issue into the mix. Fair’s fair. We should have just had a vote in parliament.”

The chief executive of Qantas, Alan Joyce, was with Mr Shorten as they toured a Qantas maintenance facility at Sydney airport.

“I think most of the LGBTI community would have preferred if this was decided by parliament,” Mr Joyce said.

“I believe we have to get behind it and make sure that we have a yes vote and certainly I will be out there strongly campaigning for a yes vote. I think it is very important for our employees, customers and our shareholders and that is why Qantas is a supporter of marriage equality.”


Community legal centres struggling to cope with rising demand

The National Census of Community Legal Centres showed almost 170,000 people were turned away from community legal centres last year, with 75 per cent of those being turned way due to a lack of financial resources.


Of those who did access legal services 15 per cent were Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders, and 26 per cent came from a multicultural background.

For Karen refugee, Labah Mooree, having access to legal advice through a legal centre outreach program has had a significant impact on his life.

He was working as a cleaner and being underpaid, but it wasn’t until he had access to legal information provided in Karen that he had the confidence to raise the issue with his employer.Labah Mooree was able to recover lost wages after getting legal advice. SBS

“Sometimes [hours I worked on the] weekend or other hours went missing,” Mr Mooree told SBS World News through a translator.

“I know that due to the language barriers that was the cause of the problem. I didn’t know about the problem before, but I knew it was continuing,” he said.


However many others like Mr Mooree aren’t accessing the support they need.

National Association for Legal Centres CEO Nassim Arrage said that the number of people being turned away last year had increased by 6 per cent from the previous year due to a rising demand for services.

“Often these are people who are vulnerable, who don’t speak English, are homeless or have a mental health condition. When we’re not able to help them they’ve got nowhere else to go,” Mr Arrage told SBS World News.

National Association for Legal Centres CEO Nassim Arrage says those turned away are the most vulnerable. SBS

At West Justice, a community legal service in Melbourne’s outer western suburbs, having to turn clients away is an all too familiar experience.

“We know there are hundreds and hundreds of people who would like us to give not just advice, but actual case work, and we just don’t have the resources to do that,” CEO Denis Nelthorpe said.

He says many newly arrived migrant communities don’t seek out legal support because they aren’t aware of their rights.West Justice CEO Denis Nelthorpe says around half of their clients are newly arrived migrants.SBS

“There are very low levels of understanding partly because the laws are so different from the countries they came from,” Mr Nelthorpe said. 

“But also because the way in which you get that information in this country is by ringing telephone lines… and that’s pretty difficult if you have English as a second language,” he added.

Related reading

Trump to lay out strategy for Afghanistan in prime-time television address

President Donald Trump is to lay out the US strategy for the war in Afghanistan in a prime-time television address to the American people, the White House says.


A White House statement said Trump, at Fort Myer near Washington, will “provide an update on the path forward for America’s engagement in Afghanistan and South Asia” on Monday night at 9pm.


Trump and his national security team met on Friday at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland to reach agreement on a strategy.

Trump tweeted over the weekend that he had made a decision. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, travelling in Afghanstan on Sunday, also said Trump had reached a decision. Mattis declined to discuss specifics before Trump’s announcement.

Important day spent at Camp David with our very talented Generals and military leaders. Many decisions made, including on Afghanistan.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2017

It will be Trump’s first formal address to the nation as president, and it follows a period of isolation for Trump following his comments about racial violence in Charlottesville, Virginia.

US Commander for Afghanistan not present

The administration has struggled for months to formulate a new approach to the war. But stepping up the fight in a way that advances peace prospects may be even more difficult, in part because the Taliban has been gaining ground and shown no interest in peace negotiations.

Trump met at the presidential retreat in nearby Maryland with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defence Secretary Jim Mattis, top intelligence agency officials and other top military and diplomatic aides. Mattis said earlier this week the administration was “very close” to finalising a new approach.

The meeting participants did not include Steve Bannon, the Trump strategist whose resignation was announced at midday.

Also excluded was General Joseph Votel, the Central Command chief who is responsible for US military operations in the greater Middle East, including Afghanistan.

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford arrives at Fort Greely, Alaska for a refueling stop.AAP

Votel told reporters travelling with him in the region this week that Mattis and General Joseph Dunford, the Joint Chiefs chairman, represent him in the White House-led Afghanistan strategy review.

By retreating to the seclusion of Camp David in Maryland’s Catoctin Mountains, Trump was taking an opportunity to regroup after a politically bruising week of criticism of his response to the deadly protests in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Solutions for Afghanistan, the longest war in American history, eluded the Obama administration and haven’t come easily to Trump, who said almost nothing about the conflict during his presidential campaign.

Since taking office, he has considered options ranging from walking away from the war to sending in additional troops. Abandoning Afghanistan is seen as unlikely in light of US concerns about countering terrorism.

In remarks at the State Department on Thursday, Mattis told reporters the Camp David talks “will move this toward a decision.”

“We are coming very close to a decision, and I anticipate it in the very near future,” he added.


Open letter calls UN to ban ‘killer robots’ but experts sceptical it can be enforced

Over 100 leaders of major robotics and artificial intelligence companies have signed an open letter urging the UN to prevent an arms race involving lethal autonomous weapons, and to protect civilians from conflicts that are yet to be fully comprehended.


The letter’s signatories include Tesla founder Elon Musk and the head of Applied AI at Google’s DeepMind, Mustafa Suleyman.

But Dr Malcolm Davis from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said he was sceptical that any sort of ban can be enforced effectively.

“Our authoritarian adversaries, like Russia and China, and rogue states like North Korea are not going to sign up to this ban,” he said.

“They use lethal autonomous weapons on a large scale and they use them ruthlessly.

“Even if we sign up to the ban and we don’t have them our adversaries would have them, and that will leave us at a severe disadvantage.”

Dr Davis added that there would be no way to effectively verify or monitor the use of such technology.

“It’s going to be encumbent upon us to maintain our edge on this technology because we know our adversaries will be doing the same,” he said.

“There is the potential for an autonomous arms race of sorts that we can’t avoid.”

The UN was supposed to discuss the issue this week, but the talks have been pushed back to November.

Weapons of terror

Currently, 19 of its 123 member countries agree an outright ban should be in place, but Australia is not one of them.

Toby Walsh, Scientia Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, was one of the main organisers of the letter.

It was released at the opening of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017) in Melbourne, the world’s pre-eminent gathering of top experts in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics

“[Automated weapons] will completely change the speed and efficiency with which armies can kill the other side,” he said.

“They will be weapons of terror, weapons that get used by rogue nations and terrorists against civilian populations.

“Australia has been rather unhelpful in the discussion so far surrounding autonomous weapons. It’s a great disappointment, because Australia has often led the way on discussion about nuclear non-proliferation treaties and weapon bans, yet this time we seem to be more careful to follow the US lead.”

Stuart Russell, the founder of technology company Bayesian Logic Inc, was among the letter’s 116 signatories.

He said lethal autonomous weapons, including swarms of micro drones, should be urgently banned before a wave of weapons of mass destruction gets out of control.

“I’m not talking about drones which are now 30 feet long aircraft, but little tiny things that are one inch in diameter that you can buy in a toy shop, and with the right software and high explosives can become a lethal weapon,” he said.

But like Dr Malcolm Davis, Mr Russell said he was “not at all confident” the UN will act as a result of the letter.

“I still think we’re on a knife edge,” he said. “It depends on the US, the UK, Russia and China. I’m not even sure if it’s 50/50 that we’ll have a treaty.”